Blogger Tricks

Sunday, 25 September 2016

peanutsammy + 1003p4 (Member)

Hello, Jammers, it is Flint again with 2 WHOLE, NOT HALF scammers found on September 25.



So I found Peanut advertising for a giveaway.


I went, and they said this. In case you are wondering, Fabulous Magicwolf is the scammer, and Snowspirit is another person. And a 'contest' is a scam.


And this. They meant 'If I don't scam, how do I know who wins?'


Then we called it a scam, and she said this.


And she locked.


Then I tracked her to the 2nd person, 1003p4, and they were partnering and doing another spike giveaway.


This is her partner supporting her. 


This is how to 'win'.


This is a chat box picture that isn't very useful but I took anyways. The important thing it Fabulous Magicwolf's sentence.

This is her announcing her partner 'won'. This is when everyone starting calling 'SCAM'.


This is her insulting me after I said she scammed.



This is her volunteering to give us one last chance to get scammed.


And after we called 'SCAM' on that one she left. Report both of them for scamming,

Status: No One Harmed


23 comments:

  1. I see the amount of Agents being fired lately. Not good.
    -WatchoutSWS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, actually, it's rather good. There's no benefit to keeping around agents who aren't going to do their job and are not good agents overall.

      Delete
    2. True, true -akmlynx

      Delete
    3. I never said the purpose of me coming. Did I ever say anything about being against the SWS? No, I did not. I choose the name WatchoutSWS to stay anonymous yet gain attention at the same time. You can assume I am against this society, and if you choose to believe that, then I will in fact be against the society. You will decide my intentions.

      -WatchoutSWS

      Delete
    4. I said absolutely nothing about you being against the society. You should actually read my comment before you copy and paste your answer to someone else's comment.

      Delete
    5. @WatchoutSWS Stop trying to be make a stale SWS meme edgy again

      Delete
    6. I am not some naive five year old. Perhaps you should actually read my comment before commenting a 'salty', as you phrase it, comment.

      -WatchOutSWS

      Delete
    7. ----No more comments from Anons will be published in this thread unless they sign their main account----

      Delete
  2. @watchoutSWS is it really necessary to bring back the "watchoutCerise" thing but now for the SWS. That caused enough drama, please don't bring it back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I wasn't here during that, but when I was still FlintFox9 I liked reading the archives, and I don't want that to happen again.

      Delete
    2. I never said the purpose of me coming. Did I ever say anything about being against the SWS? No, I did not. I choose the name WatchoutSWS to stay anonymous yet gain attention at the same time. You can assume I am against this society, and if you choose to believe that, then I will in fact be against the society. You will decide my intentions. WatchoutCerise was a completely different person than I. You must learn to stay open-minded.

      -WatchoutSWS

      Delete
    3. 'WatchOutSWS' seems rather ominous, and is similar to WOC, so please don't be surprised if we take you as a threat. But we did, at no point, say that you were against us. Also, why'd you put it twice?

      Delete
    4. Also, you contradicted youself. You said "I never said the purpose of me coming" then proceeded to say "I choose the name WatchoutSWS to stay anonymous yet gain attention at the same time". So you just told us why you came, for attention.

      Delete
    5. Perhaps you should rethink what I said. Commenting as just another anonymous would gain he eye of nobody, and attention is actually not what I came for at all. I just choose WatchOutSWS as my "name" to be identified. If recreating WOC is too stressful, I will in fact change it, but I cannot think of another name.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    8. Ok, my original comment got removed. So now I will talk.
      After this point, I will not converse with any Anons unless they A. Sign in w/ their main account on AJ or B. Are asking a question.
      It seems odd that you would choose a name with a meaning that makes some uncomfortable.
      Also, if this turns into an argument, it will not work out too terribly well, because there aren't many people on this earth that will admit when they are wrong. Most won't, including you and I, and arguments only end when someone admits defeat, which nobody will do. So arguing about your true purpose here or who you are will be pointless.
      Also, I see your point about being 'identified' and that normal Anons gain the eye of no-one unless they impostor. But recreating WOC may be stressful, so if you think of another name, change it to that.

      Delete
    9. You admit to when you are wrong (I believe) and you are very rational. I only hope to be like that.

      -???

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. �� I hope not, I was here when woc was first formed and it was a nightmare. There just was so drama...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ok I think we've pretty much made the point clear, please NO one recreate anything similar to WOC -penguin820

    ReplyDelete